- Jan 25, 2016
-
-
Simon Glass authored
Now that they are in their own directory, we can remove this prefix. This makes it easier to find a file since the prefix does not get in the way. Signed-off-by:
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Acked-by:
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Acked-by:
Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
-
Simon Glass authored
There are a lot of unrelated files in common, including all of the commands. Moving them into their own directory makes them easier to find and is more logical. Some commands include non-command code, such as cmd_scsi.c. This should be sorted out at some point so that the function can be enabled with or without the associated command. Unfortunately, with m68k I get this error: m68k: + M5329AFEE +arch/m68k/cpu/mcf532x/start.o: In function `_start': +arch/m68k/cpu/mcf532x/start.S:159:(.text+0x452): relocation truncated to fit: R_68K_PC16 against symbol `board_init_f' defined in .text.board_init_f section in common/built-in.o I hope someone can shed some light on what this means. I hope it isn't depending on the position of code in the image. Signed-off-by:
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Acked-by:
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Acked-by:
Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
-
- Jan 19, 2016
-
-
Tom Rini authored
In a number of places we had wordings of the GPL (or LGPL in a few cases) license text that were split in such a way that it wasn't caught previously. Convert all of these to the correct SPDX-License-Identifier tag. Signed-off-by:
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
-
- Jan 29, 2015
-
-
Sjoerd Simons authored
New command to determine the filesystem type of a given partition. Optionally stores the filesystem type in a environment variable. Signed-off-by:
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk> Reviewed-by:
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
-
- Nov 23, 2014
-
-
Suriyan Ramasami authored
The sandbox/ext4/fat/generic fs commands do not gracefully deal with files greater than 2GB. Negative values are returned in such cases. To handle this, the fs functions have been modified to take an additional parameter of type "* loff_t" which is then populated. The return value of the fs functions are used only for error conditions. Signed-off-by:
Suriyan Ramasami <suriyan.r@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> [trini: Update board/gdsys/p1022/controlcenterd-id.c, drivers/fpga/zynqpl.c for changes] Signed-off-by:
Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
-
- Aug 09, 2014
-
-
Stephen Warren authored
These commands may be used to determine the size of a file without actually reading the whole file content into memory. This may be used to determine if the file will fit into the memory buffer that will contain it. In particular, the DFU code will use it for this purpose in the next commit. Signed-off-by:
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
-
- Jul 18, 2014
-
-
Jeroen Hofstee authored
Since most commands are not public, make them static. This prevents warnings that no common prototype is available. Signed-off-by:
Jeroen Hofstee <jeroen@myspectrum.nl>
-
- Oct 07, 2013
-
-
Wolfgang Denk authored
As documented, almost all U-Boot commands expect numbers to be entered in hexadecimal input format. (Exception: for historical reasons, the "sleep" command takes its argument in decimal input format.) This rule was broken for the "load" command; for details please see especially commits 045fa1e1 "fs: add filesystem switch libary, implement ls and fsload commands" and 3f83c87e "fs: fix number base behaviour change in fatload/ext*load". In the result, the load command would always require an explicit "0x" prefix for regular (i. e. base 16 formatted) input. Change this to use the standard notation of base 16 input format. While strictly speaking this is a change of the user interface, we hope that it will not cause trouble. Stephen Warren comments (see [1]): I suppose you can change the behaviour if you want; anyone writing "0x..." for their values presumably won't be affected, and if people really do assume all values in U-Boot are in hex, presumably nobody currently relies upon using non-prefixed values with the generic load command, since it doesn't work like that right now. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/171172 Acked-by:
Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> Acked-by:
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by:
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
-
- Nov 04, 2012
-
-
Stephen Warren authored
When the generic filesystem load command "fsload" was written, I felt that "load" was too generic of a name for it, since many other similar commands already existed. However, it turns out that there is already an "fsload" command, so that name cannot be used. Rename the new "fsload" to plain "load" to avoid the conflict. At least anyone who's used a Basic interpreter should feel familiar with the name! Signed-off-by:
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
-
Stephen Warren authored
Commit 045fa1e1 "fs: add filesystem switch libary, implement ls and fsload commands" unified the implementation of fatload and ext*load with the new command fsload. However, this altered the interpretation of command-line numbers from always being base-16, to requiring a "0x" prefix for base-16 numbers. Enhance do_fsload() to allow commands to specify which base to use. Use base 0, thus requiring a "0x" prefix for the new fsload command. This feels much cleaner than assuming base 16. Use base 16 for the pre-existing fatload and ext*load to prevent a change in behaviour. Use base 16 exclusively for the loadaddr environment variable, since that variable is interpreted in multiple places, so we don't want the behaviour to change. Update command help text to make it clear where numbers are assumed to be hex, and where an explicit "0x" prefix is required. Signed-off-by:
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by:
Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
-
- Oct 29, 2012
-
-
Stephen Warren authored
Implement "ls" and "fsload" commands that act like {fat,ext2}{ls,load}, and transparently handle either file-system. This scheme could easily be extended to other filesystem types; I only didn't do it for zfs because I don't have any filesystems of that type to test with. Replace the implementation of {fat,ext[24]}{ls,load} with this new code too. Signed-off-by:
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
-