- May 07, 2018
-
-
Tom Rini authored
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line) and with slightly different comment styles than us. In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style. This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag and have introduced one. Signed-off-by:
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
-
- Jan 25, 2016
-
-
Simon Glass authored
Now that they are in their own directory, we can remove this prefix. This makes it easier to find a file since the prefix does not get in the way. Signed-off-by:
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Acked-by:
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Acked-by:
Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
-
Simon Glass authored
There are a lot of unrelated files in common, including all of the commands. Moving them into their own directory makes them easier to find and is more logical. Some commands include non-command code, such as cmd_scsi.c. This should be sorted out at some point so that the function can be enabled with or without the associated command. Unfortunately, with m68k I get this error: m68k: + M5329AFEE +arch/m68k/cpu/mcf532x/start.o: In function `_start': +arch/m68k/cpu/mcf532x/start.S:159:(.text+0x452): relocation truncated to fit: R_68K_PC16 against symbol `board_init_f' defined in .text.board_init_f section in common/built-in.o I hope someone can shed some light on what this means. I hope it isn't depending on the position of code in the image. Signed-off-by:
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Acked-by:
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Acked-by:
Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
-
- Jul 24, 2013
-
-
Wolfgang Denk authored
Signed-off-by:
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> [trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c] Signed-off-by:
Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
-
- Nov 04, 2012
-
-
Kim Phillips authored
cmd_boot.c:40:5: warning: symbol 'do_go' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_bootm.c:164:6: warning: symbol '__arch_preboot_os' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_bootm.c:477:5: warning: symbol 'do_bootm_subcommand' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_bootm.c:1022:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_bootm.c:1028:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_bootm.c:1029:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_bootm.c:1036:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_bootm.c:1042:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_bootm.c:1044:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_bootm.c:1045:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_bootm.c:1047:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_bootm.c:1089:5: warning: symbol 'do_iminfo' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_bootm.c:1176:5: warning: symbol 'do_imls' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_bootm.c:1654:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_bootm.c:1660:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_console.c:32:5: warning: symbol 'do_coninfo' was not declared. Should it be s cmd_date.c:46:5: warning: symbol 'do_date' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_echo.c:27:5: warning: symbol 'do_echo' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_exit.c:27:5: warning: symbol 'do_exit' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_fat.c:97:5: warning: symbol 'do_fat_ls' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_fat.c:136:5: warning: symbol 'do_fat_fsinfo' was not declared. Should it be s cmd_fdt.c:66:5: warning: symbol 'do_fdt' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_fdt.c:542:43: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) cmd_fdt.c:542:43: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident> cmd_fdt.c:542:43: got restricted __be32 [usertype] <noident> cmd_fdt.c:679:42: warning: cast to restricted __be32 cmd_fdt.c:820:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_fdt.c:822:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_flash.c:292:5: warning: symbol 'do_flinfo' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_flash.c:324:5: warning: symbol 'do_flerase' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_flash.c:457:5: warning: symbol 'do_protect' was not declared. Should it be st cmd_help.c:27:5: warning: symbol 'do_help' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_i2c.c:136:6: warning: symbol '__def_i2c_init_board' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_i2c.c:144:14: warning: symbol '__def_i2c_get_bus_speed' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_i2c.c:151:5: warning: symbol '__def_i2c_set_bus_speed' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_i2c.c:1322:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_i2c.c:1324:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_i2c.c:1326:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_i2c.c:1328:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_i2c.c:1337:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_i2c.c:1339:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_irq.c:27:5: warning: symbol 'do_interrupts' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_itest.c:133:5: warning: symbol 'binary_test' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_itest.c:158:5: warning: symbol 'do_itest' was not declared. Should it be stat cmd_load.c:54:5: warning: symbol 'do_load_serial' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:431:6: warning: symbol 'his_eol' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:432:6: warning: symbol 'his_pad_count' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:433:6: warning: symbol 'his_pad_char' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:434:6: warning: symbol 'his_quote' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:436:5: warning: symbol 'do_load_serial_bin' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:549:6: warning: symbol 'send_pad' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:558:6: warning: symbol 'ktrans' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:568:5: warning: symbol 'chk1' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:578:6: warning: symbol 's1_sendpacket' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:587:6: warning: symbol 'send_ack' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:600:6: warning: symbol 'send_nack' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:614:6: warning: symbol 'os_data_init' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:615:6: warning: symbol 'os_data_char' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:657:6: warning: symbol 'k_data_init' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:663:6: warning: symbol 'k_data_save' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:669:6: warning: symbol 'k_data_restore' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:675:6: warning: symbol 'k_data_char' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:693:6: warning: symbol 'send_parms' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:694:6: warning: symbol 'send_ptr' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_load.c:698:6: warning: symbol 'handle_send_packet' was not declared. Should i cmd_mdio.c:60:5: warning: symbol 'mdio_write_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mdio.c:82:5: warning: symbol 'mdio_read_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mdio.c:115:5: warning: symbol 'extract_reg_range' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mdio.c:144:5: warning: symbol 'extract_phy_range' was not declared. Should it cmd_mem.c:54:5: warning: symbol 'do_mem_md' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mem.c:150:5: warning: symbol 'do_mem_mm' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mem.c:154:5: warning: symbol 'do_mem_nm' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mem.c:159:5: warning: symbol 'do_mem_mw' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mem.c:256:5: warning: symbol 'do_mem_cmp' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mem.c:326:5: warning: symbol 'do_mem_cp' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mem.c:436:5: warning: symbol 'do_mem_base' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mem.c:449:5: warning: symbol 'do_mem_loop' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mem.c:595:5: warning: symbol 'do_mem_mtest' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mem.c:618:26: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer cmd_mem.c:1057:5: warning: symbol 'do_mem_crc' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_misc.c:30:5: warning: symbol 'do_sleep' was not declared. Should it be static cmd_mmc.c:118:5: warning: symbol 'do_mmcinfo' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mmc.c:272:32: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer cmd_mmc.c:150:5: warning: symbol 'do_mmcops' was not declared. Should it be stati cmd_mp.c:27:1: warning: symbol 'cpu_cmd' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mp.c:85:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_mp.c:88:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_mtdparts.c:150:18: warning: symbol 'mtdids' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mtdparts.c:153:18: warning: symbol 'devices' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mtdparts.c:713:5: warning: symbol 'mtd_device_validate' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mtdparts.c:1887:5: warning: symbol 'do_chpart' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mtdparts.c:1925:5: warning: symbol 'do_mtdparts' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_mtdparts.c:2060:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_mtdparts.c:2063:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_mtdparts.c:2066:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_mtdparts.c:2071:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_mtdparts.c:2073:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nand.c:377:18: error: bad constant expression cmd_nand.c:431:5: warning: symbol 'do_nand' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_nand.c:796:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nand.c:801:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nand.c:802:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nand.c:806:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nand.c:819:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nand.c:824:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nand.c:825:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nand.c:831:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nand.c:918:5: warning: symbol 'do_nandboot' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_net.c:33:5: warning: symbol 'do_bootp' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_net.c:107:5: warning: symbol 'do_dhcp' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_net.c:120:5: warning: symbol 'do_nfs' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_nvedit.c:138:5: warning: symbol 'do_env_print' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_nvedit.c:323:5: warning: symbol '_do_env_set' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_nvedit.c:435:5: warning: symbol 'do_env_set' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_nvedit.c:514:5: warning: symbol 'do_env_edit' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_nvedit.c:620:5: warning: symbol 'do_env_save' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_nvedit.c:1016:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1018:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1021:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1023:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1024:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1026:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1027:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1029:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1030:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1032:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1034:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1036:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1037:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_nvedit.c:1039:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_pci.c:38:17: warning: symbol 'ShortPCIListing' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_pci.c:38:22: warning: 'ShortPCIListing' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] cmd_pci.c:411:5: warning: symbol 'do_pci' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_pci.c:494:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_pci.c:497:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_reginfo.c:40:5: warning: symbol 'do_reginfo' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_sata.c:31:5: warning: symbol 'sata_curr_device' was not declared. Should it be static? note -> ata_piix.c doesn't seem to use 'sata_curr_device'; deleted. cmd_sata.c:32:18: warning: symbol 'sata_dev_desc' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_sata.c:70:5: warning: symbol 'do_sata' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_setexpr.c:53:5: warning: symbol 'do_setexpr' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_source.c:186:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_source.c:190:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_test.c:27:5: warning: symbol 'do_test' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_test.c:153:5: warning: symbol 'do_false' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_test.c:164:5: warning: symbol 'do_true' was not declared. Should it be static cmd_usb.c:43:6: warning: symbol 'usb_get_class_desc' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:69:6: warning: symbol 'usb_display_class_sub' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:151:6: warning: symbol 'usb_display_string' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:161:6: warning: symbol 'usb_display_desc' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:195:6: warning: symbol 'usb_display_conf_desc' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:210:6: warning: symbol 'usb_display_if_desc' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:227:6: warning: symbol 'usb_display_ep_desc' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:252:6: warning: symbol 'usb_display_config' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:283:6: warning: symbol 'usb_show_tree_graph' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:343:6: warning: symbol 'usb_show_tree' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:356:5: warning: symbol 'do_usbboot' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_usb.c:366:5: warning: symbol 'do_usb' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_version.c:31:5: warning: symbol 'do_version' was not declared. Should it be s cmd_ximg.c:46:1: warning: symbol 'do_imgextract' was not declared. Should it be static? cmd_ximg.c:272:1: error: directive in argument list cmd_ximg.c:276:1: error: directive in argument list Signed-off-by:
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
-
- Oct 03, 2012
-
-
Joe Hershberger authored
Change echo to puts characters together where it knows about them together. This improves netconsole performance by greatly reducing the number of packets that are sent. Signed-off-by:
Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>
-
- Jul 04, 2010
-
-
Wolfgang Denk authored
The hush shell dynamically allocates (and re-allocates) memory for the argument strings in the "char *argv[]" argument vector passed to commands. Any code that modifies these pointers will cause serious corruption of the malloc data structures and crash U-Boot, so make sure the compiler can check that no such modifications are being done by changing the code into "char * const argv[]". This modification is the result of debugging a strange crash caused after adding a new command, which used the following argument processing code which has been working perfectly fine in all Unix systems since version 6 - but not so in U-Boot: int main (int argc, char **argv) { while (--argc > 0 && **++argv == '-') { /* ====> */ while (*++*argv) { switch (**argv) { case 'd': debug++; break; ... default: usage (); } } } ... } The line marked "====>" will corrupt the malloc data structures and usually cause U-Boot to crash when the next command gets executed by the shell. With the modification, the compiler will prevent this with an error: increment of read-only location '*argv' N.B.: The code above can be trivially rewritten like this: while (--argc > 0 && **++argv == '-') { char *arg = *argv; while (*++arg) { switch (*arg) { ... Signed-off-by:
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Acked-by:
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
-
- Nov 22, 2009
-
-
Peter Tyser authored
command.c should contain common code related to commands, not miscellaneous command implementations. Signed-off-by:
Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
-
- Jan 24, 2009
-
-
Yuri Tikhonov authored
When compile u-boot with the 2.18 binutils the following warning messages for each object file in post/lib_ppc/fpu/ is produced at the linking stage: post/libpost.a(acc1.o) uses hard float, u-boot uses soft-float ... This is because of the fact that, in general, the soft-float and hard-float ABIs are incompatible; the 2.18 binutils do checking of the Tag_GNU_Power_ABI_FP attribute of the files to be linked, and produce the worning like above if these are not compatible. The incompatibility of ABIs is concerned only the float values: e.g. the soft-float ABI assumes the float argument passing in the pair of rX registers, and the hard-float ABI assumes passing of the float argument in the fX register. When we don't pass the float arguments between the functions compiled with different floatness, then such an application will work correctly. This is the case for the FPU POST: u-boot (compiled with soft-float) doesn't pass to (and doesn't get from) the FPU POST functions any floats; there are no functions exported from the post/lib_ppc/fpu/ objects which would work with float parameters/returns too. So, we can reassure the linker not to worry about the difference in ABI attributes of linking files just by setting the 'soft-float' attribute for the objects in post/lib_ppc/fpu. And this patch does this. Also, to avoid passing both soft- and hard-float options in CFLAGS when compiling the files from post/lib_ppc/fpu (which is OK, but looks rather dirty) this patch removes the soft-float string from CFLAGS in post/lib_ppc/fpu/Makefile. Signed-off-by:
Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
-
- Oct 18, 2008
-
-
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD authored
Signed-off-by:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
-
- Apr 22, 2008
-
-
Yuri Tikhonov authored
Remove CONFIG_POST ifdefs from the post/ source files. Signed-off-by:
Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com> Signed-off-by:
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
-
- Jul 05, 2007
-
-
Sergei Poselenov authored
Signed-off-by:
Sergei Poselenov <sposelenov@emcraft.com>
-
- Mar 06, 2007
-
-
Wolfgang Denk authored
-
- Jun 07, 2004
-
-
Wolfgang Denk authored
- Intracom board update. - Add Codec POST.
-
- Apr 15, 2004
-
-
Wolfgang Denk authored
- add support for the Epson 156x series of graphical displays (These displays are serial and not suitable for using a normal framebuffer console on them) - add infrastructure needed in order to POST any DSPs in a board
-
- Jan 03, 2004
-
-
Wolfgang Denk authored
Add support for the Marvell DB64360 / DB64460 development boards * Patch by Detlev Zundel, 10 Dec 2003: fix dependency problem in examples/Makefile
-
- Aug 27, 2002
-
-
Wolfgang Denk authored
-
- Nov 12, 2000
-
-
Wolfgang Denk authored
-