Forked from
Reform / reform-boundary-uboot
Source project has a limited visibility.
-
Angelo Dureghello authored
Add support for SST 4KB sector granularity. Many recent SST flashes, i.e. SST39VF3201B and similar of this family are declared CFI-conformant from SST. They support CFI query, but implement 2 different sector sizes in the same memory: a 64KB sector (they call it "block", std AMD erase cmd=0x30), and a 4KB sector (they call it "sector", erase cmd=0x50). Also, CFI query on these chips, reading from address 0x2dh of cfi query struct, detects a number of secotrs for the 4KB granularity (flinfo shows it). For all other aspects, they are CFI compliant, so, as Linux do, i think it's a good idea to handle these chips in the CFI driver, with a fixup to allow 4KB granularity, as should be expected, instead of 64KB. Signed-off-by:
Angelo Dureghello <sysamfw@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Stefan Rose <sr@denx.de>
Angelo Dureghello authoredAdd support for SST 4KB sector granularity. Many recent SST flashes, i.e. SST39VF3201B and similar of this family are declared CFI-conformant from SST. They support CFI query, but implement 2 different sector sizes in the same memory: a 64KB sector (they call it "block", std AMD erase cmd=0x30), and a 4KB sector (they call it "sector", erase cmd=0x50). Also, CFI query on these chips, reading from address 0x2dh of cfi query struct, detects a number of secotrs for the 4KB granularity (flinfo shows it). For all other aspects, they are CFI compliant, so, as Linux do, i think it's a good idea to handle these chips in the CFI driver, with a fixup to allow 4KB granularity, as should be expected, instead of 64KB. Signed-off-by:
Angelo Dureghello <sysamfw@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Stefan Rose <sr@denx.de>