From a3df99b50f759794df9ee13f3a371954eb6b761b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:13:29 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] mx6: soc: Do not apply the PFD erratum for mx6solox

The PFD issue is not present on mx6solox, so skip it in this case.

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c
index 2012caf2e77..f2dee76941b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c
@@ -337,6 +337,10 @@ void s_init(void)
 	u32 mask480;
 	u32 mask528;
 
+
+	if (is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6SX))
+		return;
+
 	/* Due to hardware limitation, on MX6Q we need to gate/ungate all PFDs
 	 * to make sure PFD is working right, otherwise, PFDs may
 	 * not output clock after reset, MX6DL and MX6SL have added 396M pfd
-- 
GitLab